Retesting physicians every ten years
- Kind
- Policy and health systems
Prompt
Imagine a licensing body that lets physicians keep their license for their whole career, as long as they complete yearly courses and no serious complaints are made against them. It now proposes that every physician pass a new knowledge and skills assessment every ten years to keep practicing. Supporters say that medicine changes quickly, that patients assume their doctor's knowledge is up to date, and that pilots already face regular testing. Critics say that the assessment would cost each physician about $3,000 and a week away from patients, that there is little evidence such exams prevent harm, and that experienced doctors who are already in short supply may retire early rather than take the test. Should the proposal be adopted? Discuss the arguments on both sides.
Practice this question
After you practice: what this question tests and how to approach it
What this question tests
- Health systems and advocacy
- Critical thinking
How to approach this question
This MMI policy station tests whether you can balance public confidence in physicians' competence against cost, weak evidence and the risk of losing experienced doctors who are already scarce. Lay out both sides fairly, including the comparison to pilots and where it holds or breaks down. Ask aloud what evidence exists, who pays the $3,000, and whether alternatives such as peer review or assessment only after concerns arise could work better. Take a clear position, perhaps with changes to the design, and explain the trade-off you accept. When the station makes the policy personal, weigh one community's loyalty and access to care against the reasons the assessment exists, and say whether your view holds.
More on colleague conduct and patient safety
All 8 questions on this topicMock interviews
If you want to practice with a person, we run mock MMI and panel interviews with feedback on every answer.
