Sugar tax on drinks
- Kind
- Policy and health systems
Prompt
Several cities and countries have introduced a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce obesity and type 2 diabetes. Supporters point to drops in consumption after the tax was introduced. Critics argue that the tax falls hardest on low-income families, and that government should not decide what adults eat and drink. Should governments tax unhealthy foods and drinks? Discuss the arguments on both sides.
Practice this question
After you practice: what this question tests and how to approach it
What this question tests
- Critical thinking
- Health systems and advocacy
How to approach this question
This MMI station on a sugar tax tests whether you can weigh public health goals against personal choice and fairness to low-income families. Name the stakeholders: people at risk of illnesses linked to diet, low-income families who spend more of their income on food, beverage companies, and governments that fund health care. Present both sides fairly, including the evidence that consumption drops and the arguments that the tax hits poorer families hardest and that adults should make their own choices. Consider design choices that change the balance, such as using the revenue to lower the price of healthy food or fund community programs. Then take a clear position on whether governments should tax unhealthy foods and drinks. When asked where public health ends and personal choice begins, offer a principle you could apply to other cases.
More on public health and individual liberty
All 9 questions on this topicMock interviews
If you want to practice with a person, we run mock MMI and panel interviews with feedback on every answer.
